test performance can improve dramatically if students are offered rewards just before they are given 1 tests and if they receive the 2（刺激的） immediately 3, new research at the university of chicago shows. educators have long debated the value of financial and other rewards as 4, but a series of experiments in chicago-area schools showed that with the right kind of rewards, students achievement improved by as much as six months beyond what would be expected.
the rewards 5 provide students with an incentive to take tests more seriously. one implication is that policymakers may underestimate students' ability in otherwise low-performing schools, according to the research team that conducted the experiments.
researchers used financial rewards to boost performance for older students and non-financial rewards, such as 6, to improve performance among younger students.
the 7 of losing a reward created a stronger desire to perform than the possibility of receiving a reward after a test, the research showed. students who were given money or a 8 to look at while they tested performed better.
"most importantly, all motivating power of the incentives vanishes when rewards are handed out with a delay," said lead author sally sadoff, a 2010 phd graduate in economics, who did the research as a griffin postdoctoral scholar at uchicago from 2010-11.
sadoff, now an assistant professor at the university of california, san diego, was part a team that conducted a series of experiments involving 7,000 students in the chicago public schools as well as in elementary and high school districts in south-suburban chicago heights.
the team studied the impact of incentives on students taking 9 short, standardized diagnostic tests given three times a year to determine their grasp of mathematics and english skills. unlike other tests on incentives, the students were not told ahead of time of the rewards so they could not study but rather demonstrated the impact of the rewards themselves on performance.
the research was reported in the paper, "the behaviorist goes to school: 10 behavioral economics to improve educational performance," published by the national bureau of economic research.
sadoff was joined in her work by john list, the homer j. livingston professor in economics and one of the nation's leading scholars of experimental economics; steven levitt, the william b. ogden 11 service professor in economics at uchicago; and susanne neckermann, a scholar at the center for european economic research in germany.
the team found that elementary school students, who were given nonfinancial rewards, responded more to incentives than high schoolers. those students were given trophies, as they have been found to be more responsive to non-monetary rewards than older students.
收听单词发音 
