the united states needs to fundamentally rethink its policy of promoting ethanol乙醇，酒精 to diversify使多样化 its energy sources and increase energy security, according to a new policy paper by rice university's 2 institute for public policy. the paper, "fundamentals of a sustainable u.s. biofuels policy," questions the economic, environmental and logistical basis for the billions of dollars in federal 3津贴，补贴 and protectionist贸易保护主义者 5 that go to domestic ethanol producers every year. "we need to set realistic targets for ethanol in the united states instead of just throwing 6 money out the window," said amy myers jaffe, one of the report's authors.
jaffe is a fellow in energy studies at the baker institute and associate director of the rice energy program.
as an example of the unintended economic consequences of u.s. biofuels policy, the report notes that in 2008 "the u.s. government spent $4 billion in biofuels subsidies to replace roughly 2 percent of the u.s. gasoline supply. the average cost to the taxpayer of those 'substituted代替的' barrels of gasoline was roughly $82 a barrel, or $1.95 per gallon on top of the retail零售的 gasoline price (i.e., what consumers pay at the pump)." the report questions whether mandated托管，强制执行 volumes for biofuels can be met and whether biofuels are improving the environment or energy security.
the report, which includes analysis by environmental scientists, highlights the environmental threats posed by current biofuels policy. "increases in corn-based ethanol production in the midwest could cause an increase in detrimental有害的，不利的 regional environmental impacts," the study states, "including 10恶化 damage to 11 and fisheries along the mississippi river and in the 12 of mexico and creating water shortages in some areas experiencing significant increases in fuel crop irrigation." moreover, the report challenges claims that ethanol use lowers greenhouse gas (ghg) 13 and argues, "there is no scientific consensus一致，合意 on the climate-friendly nature of u.s.-produced corn-based ethanol, and it should not be credited with reducing ghgs when compared to the burning of traditional gasoline."
in 2007, congress passed the energy independence and security act (eisa) that 8 production targets for "renewable fuels," mainly biodiesel生物柴油 and ethanol. the bill mandated ambitious production targets of 9 billion gallons of biofuels a year in 2008 and rising to 36 billion gallons a year by 2022. corn ethanol is capped at 15 billion gallons a year in the law, but even that level will be difficult to reach given logistical and commercial barriers, according to the study. the baker institute report finds, however, that the use of flex-fuel vehicles is not likely to be extensive enough to overcome the barriers to achieving the energy independence and security act of 2007 15 for u.s. ethanol market saturation市场饱和.
the eisa also called for 21 billion gallons of advanced biofuels, produced from sources like switchgrass柳枝稷, corn stover干草，稻草 and algae藻类, to be used in the nation's fuel supply by 2022. but the report determines "existing mandated targets for advanced biofuels are not currently achievable -- scientifically or commercially -- and should be revisited."
as a result, the report's authors wrote, "we encourage congress to revisit these mandates and revise them to be in line with realizable targets and time frames to create an improved policy that will reduce 18 for refiners and allow a more orderly 19 of achievable goals and mandates by the epa."
finally, the report questions the 4关税表，收费表 imposed on ethanol imported from latin america and the caribbean. because sustainable production of u.s. domestic corn-based ethanol faces limitations, the report finds "tariff policies that block cheaper imports are probably misguided." as a result, the report states that, "we believe on balance that the economic and geopolitical地理政治学的 benefits to this trade with select regional suppliers would 20 any 'energy security' costs to having some larger percentage of u.s. ethanol supplies arriving from foreign sources."
收听单词发音 
